Public-tender illustration
Municipal Facilities Services Tender
This report excerpt shows how a delivered review presents material risks, source paths, reviewer decisions, and the action plan without exposing customer material.
Executive summary
Review posture
Action required before submission
Critical findings
1
High findings
3
Requirements reviewed
142
Human-review state
High/Critical findings reviewed
Report package formats
PDF, DOCX, XLSX
Priority findings
Mandatory certificate issue window may disqualify the bid
- Exact source
- Addendum 02 and Instructions to Bidders 2.4.1
- Page / requirement locator
- Page 18, Requirement ELIG-04
- Why it matters
- The tender requires a certificate issued within 90 days of submission. The current evidence file would be 132 days old on the deadline.
- Recommended action
- Request a replacement certificate and assign owner approval before final package upload.
- Human-review state
- Human review complete
Liquidated damages need commercial approval before pricing lock
- Exact source
- Draft Services Agreement 12.3
- Page / requirement locator
- Page 46, Contract term LD-02
- Why it matters
- Daily delay damages apply after the service start date and the sample contract does not show a practical liability cap for this exposure.
- Recommended action
- Route to the commercial owner, document accepted exposure, or raise a clarification before bid submission.
- Human-review state
- Human review complete
Reference evidence does not prove required response-time scope
- Exact source
- Technical Schedule, Requirement T-18
- Page / requirement locator
- Page 31, Evidence request REF-03
- Why it matters
- The proposal references a comparable project, but the work summary does not explicitly cover the required emergency response-time scope.
- Recommended action
- Add a source-backed reference note or replace the reference with one that proves the required service level.
- Human-review state
- Reviewer action recorded
Compliance matrix
| Requirement | Source | Evidence status | Owner | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certificate of good standing issued within 90 days | Instructions 2.4.1; Addendum 02 | Owner action required | Bid operations | Critical | Replace stale certificate |
| Three comparable references from the last five years | Technical Schedule T-18 | Needs reviewer confirmation | Proposal lead | High | Strengthen reference evidence |
| Addendum acknowledgement in final submission package | Addendum 01, Submission Checklist | Controlled | Submission manager | Controlled | Keep in final checklist |
| Insurance certificate naming required contracting entity | Draft Agreement 9.1 | Evidence gap | Legal operations | High | Confirm named insured and limits |
Review package
| Package item | What it includes | Release rule |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Risk Report | Material findings, severity, source path, action owner | Released after reviewer decision |
| Compliance Matrix | Requirement, evidence status, owner, action | Customer-visible rows only |
| Evidence Appendix | Source excerpts and page or requirement locators | Bounded to supporting material |
| Proposal Gap Review | Gaps between tender requirements and draft response | Only when proposal review is in scope |
What happens next
Apply this review format to an active tender.
DueBid qualifies the scope, confidentiality mode, and turnaround before work begins. Material findings are human-reviewed before release.
Request a 48-hour review